If the government exercises eminent domain, what must they do for the current property occupant?

When the government exercises eminent domain, it is legally required to provide just compensation to the property owner or occupant affected by the taking of their property. This compensation must reflect the fair market value of the property being taken, ensuring that the individual is not left at a financial loss due to the seizure.

Allowing the current occupant to complete their lease term and providing compensation is consistent with the principles of eminent domain. It respects the rights of tenants or occupants and provides them with a fair resolution, including compensation that accounts for their loss and the potential disruption to their living situation. This ensures that their financial interests are protected as they are displaced by the government's actions.

While other options might seem plausible, they do not align with the legal and ethical obligations associated with eminent domain. For instance, evicting a tenant without compensation would be unjust, as it ignores their rights and needs. Offering a notice period without compensation fails to adequately address the financial implications of the displacement. Similarly, the option to buy the property back does not provide an immediate solution nor assures compensation in the context of eminent domain. Therefore, the correct response aligns with the requirement for just compensation in the exercise of eminent domain.